Compare Obsidian Web Clipper, OneNote Web Clipper, and Save to Pocket: Which Extension is the Best?

	Obsidian Web Clipper	OneNote Web Clipper	Save to Pocket
	Obsidian Web Clipper is a browser extension that lets you save, highlight, and organize web content to your Obsidian vault with templates, hotkeys, metadata extraction, and local storage. Web Clipper Highlighter	OneNote Web Clipper is a versatile tool for saving web content directly to your OneNote notebooks. The simple and intuitive design was imposing. However, it could do with a few more functions. Web Clipper Productivity	Save to Pocket is a browser extension that lets you save articles, videos, and more. With over 2 M+ users, it promises a cross-device reading experience for perfect organization. But does it deliver? Web Clipper Bookmark Manager
Key Features	Privacy-focusedSave anything: Capture entire pages, selected text, or main content Highlight: Mark important passages that remain visible when revisiting pages Templates: Customize how web pages are saved with automatic metadata extraction Rules: Apply specific templates based on website patterns Hotkeys: Quick save pages with keyboard shortcuts Offline access: All content is stored locally in your Obsidian vault Privacy focused: No data collection or third-party sharing	Clip any webpage to OneNote: Save entire pages or just parts of them. Highlight and annotate: Add notes and highlights to your clips. Organize clips: Save clips to specific notebooks and sections. Offline access: Access your clips even when you're not connected to the internet.	One-Click Saving: Save articles, videos, and more with a single click. Cross-Device Sync: Access your saved content across all your devices. Tagging System: Organize your saved items with tags. Clean Reading Environment: Enjoy a distraction-free space to read your saved content. Pocket Premium: Offers additional features like custom fonts, a permanent library, and unlimited highlights.
Our Rating	8.5	8.8	7.4
Total users	278,335	1,993,714	2,000,000
Total ratings	526	69,221	7,810
Average rating	4.7 ⭐	3.9 ⭐	4.2 ⭐
Entry Level Price	Free	Free	Free
Chrome	4.8 297 ratings 200.0K+Users	4.8 68.4K+ ratings 800.0K+Users	4.2 7.8K+ ratings 2.0M+Users
Edge	4.4 20 ratings 50.6K+Users	3.0 836 ratings 1.2M+Users	-
Firefox	4.9 209 ratings 27.7K+Users	-	-
Safari	-	-	-
Features	8.7 The extension offers a comprehensive set of features that cover all essential web clipping needs. The templating system is particularly powerful, allowing for automatic metadata extraction and custom formatting. The highlight feature works well, though we noticed some issues with certain websites. The ability to save different types of content (full page, selection, main content) provides flexibility. The hotkey system is well-implemented and customizable.	8.0 OneNote Web Clipper basic functions for saving web content. In addition to saving an entire page, you can also save individual markers. In addition, screenshots of the entire page or only parts of a page can be created. An important function of the Web Clipper is that a preview is created directly when clipping and can be edited directly, for example by rewriting or highlighting text before it is synchronized with OneNote.	7.2 Save to Pocket offers a range of useful functions. The standard is that of saving websites with one click and subsequent cross-device synchronization. This worked almost in real-time in the test and is a strong advantage of the tool. The tagging system is particularly helpful for anyone who wants to organize and find their tags. This did not always work perfectly in the test. Sometimes websites were tagged, but these did not appear in the search with a unique search term. Compared to competitors such as Web-Highlights, the highlighting function is only possible after saving a website in the pocket and then searching there. It is not possible to highlight directly on the website.
Performance	6.5 The direct clipping to Obsidian did not work properly in the test. Only the headline was saved; the rest was not. However, with the intermediate step, Clip to Clipboard and then paste, it works. The clipping process can be slow on certain websites. The highlight feature sometimes lags on content-heavy pages. The extension uses minimal system resources.	9.0 The Performance was good in our tests and there were no problems. All content could be saved and transferred to the OneNote notebooks without any problems. The only performance problems mentioned by some users in the reviews are that there are sometimes synchronization problems. We were unable to reproduce this.	6.0 The extension works when saving and synchronizing content on different devices. This happens almost in real-time. However, there are performance problems with the login process, where the tab is closed on the first attempt without a login. It worked on the second attempt. There are many reports of problems with the login process in the reviews. Searching for tags also did not work properly, 4 pages were tagged with “Web Clipper”, when searching for it only 2 pages were displayed again.
Design	8.9 The interface is clean and intuitive, following Obsidian's design language. The popup menu is well-organized and easy to navigate. The highlight interface is straightforward and user-friendly. The settings page is logically structured, though some advanced options could be better documented. The visual feedback during clipping operations is clear and helpful.	8.5 The design is clear and simple, so even basic users can get started immediately without any problems. However, it could offer a few more customization options to suit individual preferences.	8.0 The extension has a clear and intuitive design. The distraction-free reading environment is a good feature. However, the login process could be a little clearer.
Value for Money	9.7 The extension is completely free with all features included. There are no premium tiers or paid versions. The feature set is comprehensive and well-implemented. The value proposition is excellent compared to paid alternatives.	9.2 As the tool is free, it offers excellent value for money. You get basic functions for saving web content. The required OneNote can also be used with certain restrictions; a paid version of Office for $69.99 per year is also not overpriced.	8.0 The free version offers basic functions that should be sufficient for many users. The premium version offers additional functions such as full-text searches or improved tagging. The price-performance ratio is fine for us but could be too high for many basic users if they only use it occasionally.
Ease of Use	8.0 Basic usage is straightforward - just click the extension icon and select what to save. The highlight feature is intuitive and works well. However, setting up custom templates requires some technical knowledge. The learning curve for advanced features can be steep. The documentation could be more comprehensive for new users.	9.3 The tool is very user-friendly and has a low and fast learning curve. Most users should find it easy to start cutting and organizing content straight away. There are only a few functions that are not self-explanatory.	7.0 The tool is generally easy to use, but the lack of initial instructions can be a problem for new users. There are also recurring registration problems, which are reported by other users in the reviews.
Security & Privacy	9.5 The extension maintains excellent privacy standards. All data is stored locally in your Obsidian vault. No data is collected or shared with third parties. The extension doesn't require any special permissions. The code is open source, allowing for community review. The developer has a clear privacy policy.	9.0 OneNote Web Clipper is from Microsoft. The same privacy policies apply when using other products such as Word, Excel, or similar.	8.0 Save to Pocket uses industry-standard security measures, including encryption and firewalls. However, there could be stronger assurances regarding data security and liability for third-party services.
Conclusion	The Obsidian Web Clipper is a powerful, privacy-friendly tool for saving web content. Its integration with Obsidian makes it particularly valuable for users of the note platform. The current focus is still on issues with clipping certain content types and occasional performance issues, which need to be resolved. The robust features and commitment to privacy make it a top choice for storing web content once the issues are resolved. For Obsidian users looking to improve their web research workflow, this extension is a must-have tool that delivers on its promise while maintaining user privacy and data control.	Overall, OneNote Web Clipper is a useful tool for anyone who simply needs to collect, store, and organize web content. It offers a number of features that make it easy to clip, annotate, and organize information. If additional features are needed on top of these basic features, other competitors should be looked at.	Save to Pocket is a tool for anyone who wants to save and organize web content efficiently. Its cross-device synchronization makes it a valuable addition to your productivity toolkit. However, it does have some drawbacks, such as occasional login issues and a lack of detailed instructions. Beginners in particular may struggle here. Overall, it's a solid choice for anyone who needs a reliable content storage solution.
	Install Obsidian Web Clipper	Install OneNote Web Clipper	Install Save to Pocket
Our Recommendation	In our comparison between Obsidian Web Clipper, OneNote Web Clipper, and Save to Pocket, OneNote Web Clipper came out on top, scoring 8.8. Save to Pocket is the most widely used, with over 2 million users and 8k+ reviews, but OneNote Web Clipper outperformed it in our review. User reviews for Obsidian Web Clipper and OneNote Web Clipper reflect our findings, while we rate Save to Pocket lower than users do. Notably, Obsidian Web Clipper has the highest user rating in the Chrome Web Store at 4.69, which supports its strong performance in our review. There are some noticeable differences between these extensions, so it's worth considering your priorities and the details below. Looking for the richest feature set? Obsidian Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 8.7. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.2. Need top performance? OneNote Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 6. Design lovers, take note: Obsidian Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 8.9. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 8. Want to get the most for your money? Obsidian Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.7. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 8. If you hate complicated tools, OneNote Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.3. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 7. With privacy and security becoming ever more important, Obsidian Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.5. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 8. If you want a quick recommendation, OneNote Web Clipper is our top pick. But as always, the best choice depends on what matters most to you.