Compare Evernote Web Clipper, Notebook Web Clipper, and Save to Pocket: Which Extension is the Best?

	Evernote Web Clipper	Notebook Web Clipper	Save to Pocket
	Evernote Web Clipper is a tool for saving web content directly to your Evernote account. It offers great features like customizable clips and tagging but has some usability issues. Web Clipper Productivity	Notebook Web Clipper is a versatile tool for capturing web content. Zoho describes itself as the alternative to Evernote and is a great choice for creatives and productivity enthusiasts. Web Clipper Bookmark Manager	Save to Pocket is a browser extension that lets you save articles, videos, and more. With over 2 M+ users, it promises a cross-device reading experience for perfect organization. But does it deliver? Web Clipper Bookmark Manager
Key Features	Web Clipping: Save articles, web pages, and PDFs directly to Evernote. Customizable Clips: Add highlights, text, and other annotations to your clips. Tagging and Organization: Tag your saved content for easy retrieval. Screen Capture: Capture full web pages or specific parts without ads and sidebars. Integration: Seamlessly integrates with your Evernote account.	Web Clipping: Save text, images, and links as note cards. Clean View: Clip articles without ads for a distraction-free reading experience. Screenshot Tool: Capture and annotate screenshots directly. Smart Cards: Convert links into smart cards for easy reference. Meeting Notes: Take notes during online meetings with integrated tools.	One-Click Saving: Save articles, videos, and more with a single click. Cross-Device Sync: Access your saved content across all your devices. Tagging System: Organize your saved items with tags. Clean Reading Environment: Enjoy a distraction-free space to read your saved content. Pocket Premium: Offers additional features like custom fonts, a permanent library, and unlimited highlights.
Our Rating	7.4	8.8	7.4
Total users	2,066,575	102,995	2,000,000
Total ratings	130,705	1,097	7,810
Average rating	4.1 ⭐	3.9 ⭐	4.2 ⭐
Entry Level Price	Free	Free	Free
Chrome	4.7 129.5K+ ratings 2.0M+Users	4.2 1.0K+ ratings 70.0K+Users	4.2 7.8K+ ratings 2.0M+Users
Edge	-	3.4 13 ratings 32.0K+Users	-
Firefox	3.5 1.2K+ ratings 66.6K+Users	4.0 80 ratings 957Users	-
Safari	-	-	-
Features	8.5 Evernote Web Clipper offers a large number of functions that make it easier to save and organize web content. These include simple bookmarking, but also other functions such as the ability to add highlights and comments to screenshots, which we find particularly useful. A very important main function for us is also to set tags and easily find saved data, photos, or similar using tags. Titles can also be added here to display them clearly in your notebook.	9.3 Notebook Web Clipper offers a wide range of functions. In addition to the general saving of websites, we found the highlighting and direct saving of sections of text and the cropping options for images very helpful. Annotation tools improve the screenshot functionality here. Another unusual feature is the clean view function, where an article is clipped and ads or similar are deleted directly from the clip so that only the desired important data is saved. Other features such as the smart card functions and the integration of meeting notes are a plus for professionals, but should not be relevant for everyone. There are still some advanced functions missing that can be found in the competition. However, these will probably only be missed by a few users.	7.2 Save to Pocket offers a range of useful functions. The standard is that of saving websites with one click and subsequent cross-device synchronization. This worked almost in real-time in the test and is a strong advantage of the tool. The tagging system is particularly helpful for anyone who wants to organize and find their tags. This did not always work perfectly in the test. Sometimes websites were tagged, but these did not appear in the search with a unique search term. Compared to competitors such as Web-Highlights, the highlighting function is only possible after saving a website in the pocket and then searching there. It is not possible to highlight directly on the website.
Performance	7.0 Performance is a major drawback of Evernote Web Clipper. Many users report issues in reviews about the tool not loading or not working properly. Although it offers many features, these performance issues can be annoying and limit overall effectiveness. In our tests, only a few minor performance issues were detected.	8.0 In general, the extensions work reliably, but can occasionally have delays. In our test, even large clips were processed well and quickly. Regular updates further improve the stability here.	6.0 The extension works when saving and synchronizing content on different devices. This happens almost in real-time. However, there are performance problems with the login process, where the tab is closed on the first attempt without a login. It worked on the second attempt. There are many reports of problems with the login process in the reviews. Searching for tags also did not work properly, 4 pages were tagged with “Web Clipper”, when searching for it only 2 pages were displayed again.
Design	7.0 The design is functional, but not particularly intuitive. Although the interface is clear, navigating the settings and functions is somewhat confusing. Improvements in the design of the user interface could improve the accessibility of the tool for a larger target group.	7.5 The extension offers a clean and clear interface. In our opinion, however, there could be a little more customization options. Some users find the design a little outdated.	8.0 The extension has a clear and intuitive design. The distraction-free reading environment is a good feature. However, the login process could be a little clearer.
Value for Money	7.5 The extension itself is free, but it is only really useful when the paid version of Evernote is activated. Considering that you have to think your way in to set everything up and use it, the price-performance ratio might be a bit expensive for basic users.	9.5 The free version already offers extensive functions. The premium version adds even more functions. The price-performance ratio of just 19.99 dollars per year is almost unbeatable, especially when compared with price plans from other providers such as Evernote.	8.0 The free version offers basic functions that should be sufficient for many users. The premium version offers additional functions such as full-text searches or improved tagging. The price-performance ratio is fine for us but could be too high for many basic users if they only use it occasionally.
Ease of Use	6.5 The tool has a slightly larger learning curve, especially for new users. Numerous shortcuts can be defined for easy clipping, but it can take a long time from initial setup to full use. In addition, many users have reported problems with logging in and loading the tool.	9.0 In our tests, the basic functions were intuitive to use. In addition, a clear tutorial is shown directly after installation. For more advanced functions such as shortcuts, you have to click your way through the extension, but this is not difficult. Existing Zoho Notebook users in particular should have no problems.	7.0 The tool is generally easy to use, but the lack of initial instructions can be a problem for new users. There are also recurring registration problems, which are reported by other users in the reviews.
Security & Privacy	8.0 Evernote Web Clipper handles user data responsibly and has clear data protection guidelines. However, the tool does not respond to “Do Not Track” signals, which could be problematic for some users who value this. The data is stored on US servers, meaning data protection law applies there.	9.3 Your data is encrypted by Zoho during transmission and at rest. There is also a clear data protection policy without selling data.	8.0 Save to Pocket uses industry-standard security measures, including encryption and firewalls. However, there could be stronger assurances regarding data security and liability for third-party services.
Conclusion	Evernote Web Clipper is a good tool for anyone who needs to save and organize web content. Its integration with Evernote makes it a powerful extension for productivity enthusiasts, especially if Evernote is already in use. Drawbacks include ease of use and performance issues reported by users. Overall, it is a strong tool but may require some patience and troubleshooting.	Notebook Web Clipper is a good tool for anyone who wants to increase their productivity by efficiently organizing web content. The integration with Zoho Notebook makes it a must-have for existing users of the platform. Due to its features and superior price-performance ratio, users of other current programs such as Evernote should also consider it as an alternative. Only minor design and performance issues could be improved. Overall, it offers good value for money, especially for those upgrading to the Pro version.	Save to Pocket is a tool for anyone who wants to save and organize web content efficiently. Its cross-device synchronization makes it a valuable addition to your productivity toolkit. However, it does have some drawbacks, such as occasional login issues and a lack of detailed instructions. Beginners in particular may struggle here. Overall, it's a solid choice for anyone who needs a reliable content storage solution.
	Install Evernote Web Clipper	Install Notebook Web Clipper	Install Save to Pocket
Our Recommendation	In our comparison between Evernote Web Clipper, Notebook Web Clipper, and Save to Pocket, Notebook Web Clipper came out on top, scoring 8.8. Evernote Web Clipper is the most widely used, with over 2 million users and 131k+ reviews, but Notebook Web Clipper outperformed it in our review. User reviews for Evernote Web Clipper reflect our findings, we rate Notebook Web Clipper higher than users do, and we rate Save to Pocket lower than users do. Notably, Save to Pocket has the highest user rating in the Chrome Web Store at 4.23, which is even higher than our rating of 7.4. There are some noticeable differences between these extensions, so it's worth considering your priorities and the details below. Looking for the richest feature set? Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.3. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.2. Need top performance? Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 8. On the other hand, Save to Pocket lags behind in this area with a rating of 6. Design lovers, take note: Save to Pocket stands out with a rating of 8. On the other hand, Evernote Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 7. Want to get the most for your money? Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.5. On the other hand, Evernote Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.5. If you hate complicated tools, Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Evernote Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 6.5. With privacy and security becoming ever more important, Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.3. On the other hand, Evernote Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 8. If you want a quick recommendation, Notebook Web Clipper is our top pick. But as always, the best choice depends on what matters most to you.