Compare Notebook Web Clipper and GPT Reader: Which Extension is the Best?

	Notebook Web Clipper	GPT Reader
	Notebook Web Clipper is a versatile tool for capturing web content. Zoho describes itself as the alternative to Evernote and is a great choice for creatives and productivity enthusiasts. Web Clipper Bookmark Manager	Transform any text into natural-sounding speech with this free ChatGPT-powered text-to-speech tool. We've tested its capabilities on short articles and lengthy PDFs. AI ChatGPT
Key Features	Web Clipping: Save text, images, and links as note cards. Clean View: Clip articles without ads for a distraction-free reading experience. Screenshot Tool: Capture and annotate screenshots directly. Smart Cards: Convert links into smart cards for easy reference. Meeting Notes: Take notes during online meetings with integrated tools.	Text-to-Speech Conversion: Natural-sounding AI voices powered by ChatGPT Document Support: Handles PDFs, Google Docs, and web content Audio Download: Option to save generated audio for offline listening Playback Controls: Adjustable speed, pause, and rewind functionality Multi-format Support: Works with pasted text, documents, and website content
Our Rating	8.8	9.0
Total users	102,995	9,543
Total ratings	1,097	86
Average rating	3.9 ⭐	4.2 ⭐
Entry Level Price	Free	Free
Chrome	4.2 1.0K+ ratings 70.0K+Users	4.5 67 ratings 8.0K+Users
Edge	3.4 13 ratings 32.0K+Users	-
Firefox	4.0 80 ratings 957Users	3.9 19 ratings 1.5K+Users
Safari	-	-
Features	9.3 Notebook Web Clipper offers a wide range of functions. In addition to the general saving of websites, we found the highlighting and direct saving of sections of text and the cropping options for images very helpful. Annotation tools improve the screenshot functionality here. Another unusual feature is the clean view function, where an article is clipped and ads or similar are deleted directly from the clip so that only the desired important data is saved. Other features such as the smart card functions and the integration of meeting notes are a plus for professionals, but should not be relevant for everyone. There are still some advanced functions missing that can be found in the competition. However, these will probably only be missed by a few users.	9.2 The functional scope of GPT Reader is designed for a wide range of users and demonstrated many useful functions in the test. The voice quality is surprisingly good and offers a natural-sounding output. We particularly liked the comprehensive format support, which seamlessly processes everything from PDFs to web content. The control of the playback is also well implemented, making it easy to adjust the speed directly and individually. However, the function for downloading audio files stood out the most in the test. In theory, entire books can be converted and then downloaded as audio books. However, this was the only area where we had to make deductions, as the free ChatGPT version had limitations when processing longer texts or documents. We tried to convert a 300-page PDF and were able to process 22% of it, which corresponded to around 2 hours of audio. After this 22%, the free quota of requests on ChatGPT was reached, and the request was canceled.
Performance	8.0 In general, the extensions work reliably, but can occasionally have delays. In our test, even large clips were processed well and quickly. Regular updates further improve the stability here.	8.3 The performance tests showed a mixed picture. For shorter texts and paragraphs, GPT Reader processes content quickly and delivers a smooth rendering. The application is fast and reliable for typical use cases such as articles or short documents. Here we tested self-written summaries for learning purposes. However, we encountered significant limitations with larger files, as it is not possible to complete processing due to the limited number of requests. The option of pausing and then resuming would help here. In addition, the process takes a very long time for larger files; the extension needed around 40 minutes for around 75 pages of a PDF. The limitations of the ChatGPT API particularly affect the processing of longer documents such as entire books. This is currently only possible with a premium version of ChatGPT.
Design	7.5 The extension offers a clean and clear interface. In our opinion, however, there could be a little more customization options. Some users find the design a little outdated.	9.0 The design of GPT Reader is clean and professional, with an intuitive layout that makes navigation effortless. The fact that there is even a dark as well as a light mode shows that the different user preferences have been taken into account. The controls are logically arranged and easily accessible. Even though the extension is designed for functionality, the design is not forgotten.
Value for Money	9.5 The free version already offers extensive functions. The premium version adds even more functions. The price-performance ratio of just 19.99 dollars per year is almost unbeatable, especially when compared with price plans from other providers such as Evernote.	8.9 Currently, GPT Reader offers a very good price-performance ratio, as all functions are available completely free of charge. We found no hidden costs or unexpected limitations in the free version. The features should be sufficient for most users; the only thing to note is the limited number of requests per hour that ChatGPT allows. If you need to convert entire books into one, you will need a premium version of ChatGPT. It should also be mentioned that the extension already indicates that the download function may be offered in a paid version in the future, which could influence this rating in the future. At the moment, however, it is a very good offer in the text-to-speech sector.
Ease of Use	9.0 In our tests, the basic functions were intuitive to use. In addition, a clear tutorial is shown directly after installation. For more advanced functions such as shortcuts, you have to click your way through the extension, but this is not difficult. Existing Zoho Notebook users in particular should have no problems.	8.7 In terms of user-friendliness, GPT Reader scores very well. Users of all technical levels should have little problem simply converting text to audio. The user interface is self-explanatory, and all functions are displayed immediately. The only negative point is that a separate ChatGPT registration is still required, and an error message appears if the ChatGPT requests are exceeded, which can lead to confusion.
Security & Privacy	9.3 Your data is encrypted by Zoho during transmission and at rest. There is also a clear data protection policy without selling data.	9.7 In our security analysis, GPT Reader showed a strong commitment to protecting user privacy. The extension only collects data from user-reported bugs and feedback. We appreciated the transparent privacy policy, where the user can read specific points.
Conclusion	Notebook Web Clipper is a good tool for anyone who wants to increase their productivity by efficiently organizing web content. The integration with Zoho Notebook makes it a must-have for existing users of the platform. Due to its features and superior price-performance ratio, users of other current programs such as Evernote should also consider it as an alternative. Only minor design and performance issues could be improved. Overall, it offers good value for money, especially for those upgrading to the Pro version.	GPT Reader is a promising text-to-speech extension based on ChatGPT voices. The easy-to-understand voices, combined with the fact that it is completely free, set it apart from conventional TTS tools. The extension can process various document formats. Both PDFs and copied web articles can be converted, but it has its limitations with longer texts. For example, a 300-page PDF was only partially converted in the text due to ChatGPT's limitations, which still resulted in about 2 hours of audio. The tool is very user-friendly and supports multiple languages. This extension is a must for anyone who wants to listen to texts.
	Install Notebook Web Clipper	Install GPT Reader
Our Recommendation	In our comparison between Notebook Web Clipper and GPT Reader, GPT Reader came out on top, scoring 9. Notebook Web Clipper is the most widely used, with over 103k users and 1k+ reviews, but GPT Reader outperformed it in our review. User reviews for GPT Reader reflect our findings, while we rate Notebook Web Clipper higher than users do. Notably, GPT Reader has the highest user rating in the Chrome Web Store at 4.24, which supports its strong performance in our review. In the end, the differences between these extensions are minimal, so your choice may come down to personal preference or specific features. Looking for the richest feature set? Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.3. On the other hand, GPT Reader lags behind in this area with a rating of 9.2. Need top performance? GPT Reader stands out with a rating of 8.3. On the other hand, Notebook Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 8. Design lovers, take note: GPT Reader stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Notebook Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.5. Want to get the most for your money? Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9.5. On the other hand, GPT Reader lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.9. If you hate complicated tools, Notebook Web Clipper stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, GPT Reader lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.7. With privacy and security becoming ever more important, GPT Reader stands out with a rating of 9.7. On the other hand, Notebook Web Clipper lags behind in this area with a rating of 9.3. If you want a quick recommendation, GPT Reader is our top pick. But as always, the best choice depends on what matters most to you.