Compare Web Activity Tracker and Quillbot: Which Extension is the Best?

Web Activity Time Tracker is an open-source extension that tracks time on websites, providing insights and customizable alerts to help manage online activities.
Quillbot is an AI-powered writing assistant designed to enhance your writing with features like paraphrasing, grammar checking, and summarizing. Ideal for productivity and improving writing quality.
Key Features
  • Activity Monitoring: Tracks time spent on different websites.
  • Detailed Reports: Provides insights into daily, weekly, and monthly activity.
  • Limit and Block Distracting Websites: Set daily time limits for specific websites
  • Custom Alerts: Set alerts for excessive time on specific sites.
  • Pomodoro Mode: Use the Pomodoro technique for focus work
  • Export: Export your Data to CSV.
  • Paraphrasing Tool: Rewrites your sentences to improve clarity and style.
  • Grammar Checker: Identifies and corrects grammatical errors.
  • Summarizer: Condenses long texts into shorter summaries.
  • Citation Generator: Helps you create citations in various formats.
  • Plagiarism Checker: Ensures your content is original.
Our Rating
9.2
8.7
Total users
37,399
4,485,643
Total ratings
814
3,036
Average rating
4.7 ⭐
4.6 ⭐
Entry Level PriceFreeFree
Chrome
Chrome Web Store logo
4.8
4.66
789 ratings
30.0K+Users
Chrome Web Store logo
4.7
4.88
2.9K+ ratings
4.0M+Users
Edge
Microsoft Edge Store logo
4.6
4.41
25 ratings
7.4K+Users
Microsoft Edge Store logo
4.5
4.47
104 ratings
485.6K+Users
Firefox
-
-
Safari
-
-
Features
8.7

The tool offers the option of independently tracking your time on different websites. Compared to its competitors, it stands out because it has thought about which functions are important for effective tracking.

featured

This can be seen, for example, in the function that automatically stops tracking if there is no activity on the website within a certain period. This avoids the problem faced by competitors: if several tabs are open, they all continue to be tracked simultaneously.

settings

The reports are also very clearly presented, but there is still some room for improvement in the evaluation, for example by classifying the websites directly into categories such as social media or similar, so that they can be evaluated later.

9.0

Paraphrasing Tool:
Quillbot's paraphrasing tool is one of its standout features. It offers multiple modes like Standard, Fluency, and Creative, allowing users to choose the level of rewriting they need. We found it particularly useful for avoiding plagiarism and improving sentence structure.

Grammar Checker:
The grammar checker is robust, catching errors that many basic spell checkers miss. However, it sometimes flagged correct sentences as incorrect, which can be a bit annoying.

Summarizer:
Quillbot's summarizer is effective for condensing long articles or papers. It provides concise summaries that capture the main points, making it a valuable tool for students and professionals alike.

Performance
9.7

The tool works reliably, there were no crashes or errors during testing. It tracks and reports data efficiently without you noticing any performance issues during use. A few users wrote in reviews that there were inaccuracies in the tracked time, which we could not reproduce in the test.

8.8

Quillbot performs well with small to medium-sized texts, but it can slow down when processing larger documents.

Design
9.0

The Design is clear and intuitive. Some design changes such as the dark mode can also be adjusted in the settings. In our opinion, the dashboard is the only area where there is still room for improvement in terms of presenting the evaluations.

Dashboard
9.0

User Interface:
Quillbot boasts a clean and intuitive interface. The layout is straightforward, making it easy for users to navigate through different features without any hassle.

Customization:
The tool offers various customization options, such as different paraphrasing modes and the ability to adjust the length of summaries. These features make it adaptable to different writing needs.

Value for Money
9.3

As a free tool, it offers good value for money for users looking for basic tracking features at no cost. In comparison with competitors, many functions are already offered, but other competitors still have useful functions, particularly in the evaluation of data, and there is still room for improvement here.

9.0

Free vs. Paid:
While the free version offers basic functionality, the premium plans unlock a wealth of features that significantly enhance the tool's utility.

Cost-Effectiveness:
Compared to its competitors, Quillbot is slightly cheaper than Grammarly but more expensive than LanguageTool. From our perspective, Quillbot doesn't offer more value than LanguageTool, so we believe it should be priced similarly. However, it currently offers significant discounts on their plans, which makes it a very good investment in your writing.

Ease of Use
9.0

Setting up the Web Activity Time Tracker is simple and does not require a great deal of technical skill. The tool is designed to be very user-friendly, including the setup with short instructions. The only thing that is a little confusing is that not all evaluations can be displayed in the dashboard via the icon. Only the evaluation for the current day is displayed here.

7.8

Quillbot's onboarding process is impressive, and the tool is easy to use right from the start. We quickly grasped most of its features. However, when compared to top competitors like Grammarly, it doesn't feel quite as natural or seamless to use.

Security & Privacy
9.7

Web Activity Time Tracker performs almost perfectly here, as it does not collect or transmit any data. This data is only stored on the local computer. The entire code can be read open source on GitHub.
However, it is also pointed out in the very short privacy policy that this can change; a somewhat more detailed policy would be desirable in this case, in which it is also specified which data is stored locally and where.

8.8

Data Handling:
Quillbot ensures that user data is encrypted and securely stored. However, like many AI tools, it does send data to its servers for processing, which may raise privacy concerns for some users.

Third-Party Services:
The tool uses third-party services for certain features, which could lead to data being processed outside of the EU. Users should be cautious when handling sensitive information.

Conclusion

Web Activity Time Tracker is a perfect choice for anyone who wants to know how much time is spent on which websites. The user-friendly design and comprehensive reports make it an easy tool to increase productivity. The customizability of various features also stood out. Overall, it offers good added value, especially when you consider that it's free.

Quillbot is a flexible AI writing tool that does a great job with paraphrasing and grammar checking.

While it has a few minor downsides, like occasional mistakes and some privacy concerns, its overall performance and affordability make it a solid choice. In the end, choosing the best writing tool is also a matter of personal opinion. If you want to improve your writing and boost productivity, Quillbot is definitely worth a look.

However, it still cannot compete with Grammarly as the best writing tool in this category. In our eyes, Grammarly is worth the more expensive price.

Our Recommendation

In our comparison between Web Activity Tracker and Quillbot, Web Activity Tracker came out on top, scoring 9.2.

Quillbot is the most widely used, with over 4 million users and 3k+ reviews, but Web Activity Tracker outperformed it in our review. User reviews reflect our findings.

Notably, Web Activity Tracker has the highest user rating in the Chrome Web Store at 4.71, which supports its strong performance in our review.

In the end, the differences between these extensions are minimal, so your choice may come down to personal preference or specific features.


  • Looking for the richest feature set? Quillbot stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Web Activity Tracker lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.7.
  • Need top performance? Web Activity Tracker stands out with a rating of 9.7. On the other hand, Quillbot lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.8.
  • Both look and feel great: Web Activity Tracker and Quillbot. In the Design category, Web Activity Tracker has scored an excellent 9. The design is both attractive and highly functional, making it stand out.
  • Want to get the most for your money? Web Activity Tracker stands out with a rating of 9.3. On the other hand, Quillbot lags behind in this area with a rating of 9.
  • If you hate complicated tools, Web Activity Tracker stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Quillbot lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.8.
  • With privacy and security becoming ever more important, Web Activity Tracker stands out with a rating of 9.7. On the other hand, Quillbot lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.8.

If you want a quick recommendation, Web Activity Tracker is our top pick. But as always, the best choice depends on what matters most to you.