Compare Quillbot and Tracking Time: Which Extension is the Best?

Quillbot is an AI-powered writing assistant designed to enhance your writing with features like paraphrasing, grammar checking, and summarizing. Ideal for productivity and improving writing quality.
Tracking Time is a tool for managing tasks and projects with ease. It offers strong integrations and reporting with few functions and many bugs, which lowers the rating.
Key Features
  • Paraphrasing Tool: Rewrites your sentences to improve clarity and style.
  • Grammar Checker: Identifies and corrects grammatical errors.
  • Summarizer: Condenses long texts into shorter summaries.
  • Citation Generator: Helps you create citations in various formats.
  • Plagiarism Checker: Ensures your content is original.
  • Time Tracking: Easily track time spent on tasks with a simple interface.
  • Project Management: Organize tasks and projects efficiently.
  • Reporting: Generate detailed reports to analyze productivity.
  • Integrations: Connect with popular tools like Google Calendar and Slack.
Our Rating
8.7
7.6
Total users
4,485,643
32,223
Total ratings
3,036
156
Average rating
4.6 ⭐
3.7 ⭐
Entry Level PriceFreeFree
Chrome
Chrome Web Store logo
4.7
4.88
2.9K+ ratings
4.0M+Users
Chrome Web Store logo
4.4
4.23
146 ratings
30.0K+Users
Edge
Microsoft Edge Store logo
4.5
4.47
104 ratings
485.6K+Users
Microsoft Edge Store logo
4.0
5.00
2 ratings
1.8K+Users
Firefox
-
Mozilla Firefox Add-ons Store logo
2.8
3.36
8 ratings
398Users
Safari
-
-
Features
9.0

Paraphrasing Tool:
Quillbot's paraphrasing tool is one of its standout features. It offers multiple modes like Standard, Fluency, and Creative, allowing users to choose the level of rewriting they need. We found it particularly useful for avoiding plagiarism and improving sentence structure.

Grammar Checker:
The grammar checker is robust, catching errors that many basic spell checkers miss. However, it sometimes flagged correct sentences as incorrect, which can be a bit annoying.

Summarizer:
Quillbot's summarizer is effective for condensing long articles or papers. It provides concise summaries that capture the main points, making it a valuable tool for students and professionals alike.

5.5

Tracking Time offers numerous functions aimed at both individual users and teams. Projects can be created for which time tracking can then be started. Detailed reports can then be output. In our tests, all these functions also worked in the Tracking Time tool.

Tracking Time


However, the web extension considered here was disappointing. This only has the function of starting and stopping time recording. Even when beginning time tracking, the extension requires that the corresponding project has been created. It is impossible to spontaneously start time tracking for a new project; the new project must first be made on the external Tracking Time website, where the reports can also be found.

The Tracking Time extension therefore has great potential to integrate many useful Tracking Time functions. However, the functions are currently very limited in comparison to competitors.

Performance
8.8

Quillbot performs well with small to medium-sized texts, but it can slow down when processing larger documents.

8.0

In general, Tracking Time works reliably, but in reviews some users have reported occasional slowdowns, especially when processing large data sets. Regular updates and optimizations could help improve performance consistency.

Design
9.0

User Interface:
Quillbot boasts a clean and intuitive interface. The layout is straightforward, making it easy for users to navigate through different features without any hassle.

Customization:
The tool offers various customization options, such as different paraphrasing modes and the ability to adjust the length of summaries. These features make it adaptable to different writing needs.

8.0

The design of Tracking Time is clean and modern and makes it easy to navigate. The dashboard on the website is well organized and you get an instant overview of your times. There are still improvements to be made in terms of customization options such as layouts.

Value for Money
9.0

Free vs. Paid:
While the free version offers basic functionality, the premium plans unlock a wealth of features that significantly enhance the tool's utility.

Cost-Effectiveness:
Compared to its competitors, Quillbot is slightly cheaper than Grammarly but more expensive than LanguageTool. From our perspective, Quillbot doesn't offer more value than LanguageTool, so we believe it should be priced similarly. However, it currently offers significant discounts on their plans, which makes it a very good investment in your writing.

8.0

The web extension is free of charge. However, it should be noted that it offers only a few functions. Other competitors offer considerably more functions for their free extensions. If you only use the extension in addition to Tracking Time and consider all functions in the price-performance ratio, it is competitive. In particular, the free plan already offers sufficient features for most people.
The paid plans offer advanced features and integrations with excellent value for money, making it a particularly worthwhile investment for teams looking to increase their productivity.

Ease of Use
7.8

Quillbot's onboarding process is impressive, and the tool is easy to use right from the start. We quickly grasped most of its features. However, when compared to top competitors like Grammarly, it doesn't feel quite as natural or seamless to use.

7.0

Although the tool is generally easy to use on the website, there are problems with the basic functions of the extension. In the test, we started a time recording on the website and stopped it later via the extension. When we wanted to start a new task, it took us a while to understand the principle that only tasks that had already been created could be restarted. This is not an intuitive function, which is why users might be annoyed right from the start.
One positive point, however, is the tutorials and support documentation, which can help new users.

Security & Privacy
8.8

Data Handling:
Quillbot ensures that user data is encrypted and securely stored. However, like many AI tools, it does send data to its servers for processing, which may raise privacy concerns for some users.

Third-Party Services:
The tool uses third-party services for certain features, which could lead to data being processed outside of the EU. Users should be cautious when handling sensitive information.

9.0

Tracking Time uses basic security measures to protect user data. Encryption and regular updates ensure the integrity of the data. In our research, most of this could be read in the privacy policies, but a little more transparency in the handling of user data would still be an advantage, as this is stored online.

Conclusion

Quillbot is a flexible AI writing tool that does a great job with paraphrasing and grammar checking.

While it has a few minor downsides, like occasional mistakes and some privacy concerns, its overall performance and affordability make it a solid choice. In the end, choosing the best writing tool is also a matter of personal opinion. If you want to improve your writing and boost productivity, Quillbot is definitely worth a look.

However, it still cannot compete with Grammarly as the best writing tool in this category. In our eyes, Grammarly is worth the more expensive price.

Tracking Time is a tool for anyone who wants to improve their time management. The design is very intuitive, but unfortunately, the extension has hardly any functions. The extension is useful for anyone who uses Tracking Time, but anyone looking for a good extension for time tracking will not find it here.
However, the price-performance ratio of the functions of the entire tool is good.

Our Recommendation

In our comparison between Quillbot and Tracking Time, Quillbot came out on top, scoring 8.7.

Quillbot is the most widely used, with over 4 million users and 3k+ reviews—and it also delivered the strongest performance in our tests. User reviews reflect our findings.

Notably, Quillbot has the highest user rating in the Chrome Web Store at 4.58, which supports its strong performance in our review.

There are some noticeable differences between these extensions, so it's worth considering your priorities and the details below.


  • Looking for the richest feature set? Quillbot stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Tracking Time lags behind in this area with a rating of 5.5.
  • Need top performance? Quillbot stands out with a rating of 8.8. On the other hand, Tracking Time lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.
  • Design lovers, take note: Quillbot stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Tracking Time lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.
  • Want to get the most for your money? Quillbot stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Tracking Time lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.
  • If you hate complicated tools, Quillbot stands out with a rating of 7.8. On the other hand, Tracking Time lags behind in this area with a rating of 7.
  • With privacy and security becoming ever more important, Tracking Time stands out with a rating of 9. On the other hand, Quillbot lags behind in this area with a rating of 8.8.

If you want a quick recommendation, Quillbot is our top pick. But as always, the best choice depends on what matters most to you.